Graded against the SRA’s indicators.

Indicator by indicator, with the rationale shown — in under a minute.

Legal Writing · grading result

Mr Halliday — boundary

OverallB

Likely a pass against the Performance IndicatorsPractice feedback — the SRA does the official marking.

Likely Competent (estimate)Estimate based on the SRA Performance Indicators. Not a pass guarantee. Final marking is by the SRA.

CriterionGradeRationale

Identifying relevant facts

Captured the boundary point and chain of title; missed the easement angle.

Logical structure

Three clear sub-headings; opens with the bottom line.

Correct application of law

Cited s.62 LPA 1925 but missed the Wheeldon v Burrows interaction.

Client Interview · oral mock

Recording

Webcam preview

Recording

Pace142 wpm

Fillers3.1/min

Eye contact75%

Split48/52

Live transcript

YouHas there ever been a previous incident with that colleague? Any near-misses?

ClientActually — yes. Another picker told me Tom had been warned twice before.

YouThank you. Let me play that back before we look at your options.

CriterionGradeRationale

Active listening and open questions

Followed the client’s thread; picked up the prior-warnings detail.

Summary and playback

Did not verify facts back with the client before moving to advice.

Bring your own · your attempt

Legal Writing

Your attempt342 words

Dear Mrs Watson, Further to your enquiry, I write to advise on the boundary position. On the facts provided, the registered title is determinative and the adverse possession claim is unlikely to succeed because

OverallC

Below the pass thresholdPractice feedback — the SRA does the official marking.

Borderline (estimate)Estimate based on the SRA Performance Indicators. Not a pass guarantee. Final marking is by the SRA.

CriterionGradeRationale

Skills

Advice is sound; tighten the opening sentence.

Application of Law

Right rule, but apply it to her facts to lift this into a B.

An examiner that marks you on what the SRA marks.

Every written attempt and every oral mock is graded indicator by indicator against the published SRA Performance Indicators — with the rationale shown. Most candidates reach the exam without a single graded oral mock. Kellys is the thing that changes that.

About Kellys

Indicator-aligned
PI-traceable
Filler-counted
Pace-aware
Sub-minute
Rationale-anchored
Attempt-aware
Indicator-aligned
PI-traceable
Filler-counted
Pace-aware
Sub-minute
Rationale-anchored
Attempt-aware

Written stations graded

Each station scored against the same criteria the SRA uses.

Performance Indicators encoded

Four written stations and five Client Interview indicators, mapped one-for-one.

Examiner built by an SQE2 sitter

The role of examiner is the hardest one to recruit for — so it was the role we built first.

Walk in knowing where you stand.

Written and oral practice, graded against the published criteria — at the volume practice actually requires. See how Kellys SQE Examiner works.

Kellys SQE Examiner is exam-preparation practice software, not legal advice and not the SRA. Read the AI disclaimer for the full boundaries.

Anchored evidence

1 / 4

Your attempt

Dear Mr Halliday,Thank you for your email of 14 May.I write further to your instruction on the proposed extension and the access strip currently held under your neighbour's title.On the facts you have provided, three points warrant your attention before completion.First, the title plan on its own does not resolve whether an easement has been acquired by prescription.Second, even if no easement exists, removal of the strip may engage section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925.I recommend we instruct an updated boundary plan before exchange and write to your neighbour on a without-prejudice basis.

Performance Indicator

Use a logical structureSRA Legal Writing

Opens with the bottom line — three named points, in order. The partner sees the answer first.

Each mark links to the line that earned it